The eleven Southern States

As Heidler nones, "Breaking up the United States of America was no tiny task and was not taken lightly" . The sense of unity that had been forged at Lexington - and so recently reaffirmed during the fightfare of 1812 - was a strong one. It took staggeringly strong forces to pull apart a country that had risked so much in its founding and had supposed so much in the democratic unity of the principles that it had always espoused. It is thus a little puzzling that late 20th century explanations of the civilized War should focus so narrowly on slavery, for it is hard to believe that slavery alone would have been a sufficient causation to "pull down the temple" of the United States, to borrow Andrew Calhoun's 1860 interpretation of pulling out.

In or so ways, this seeming desire to explain the Civil War entirely in terms of slavery versus abolition resides in Abraham Lincoln himself, with his insistence that the "peculiar and powerful concern" of slavery in the South "was somehow the cause of the war". These words of Lincoln's have the advantage of presenting the issue in a simple and straightforward way - sort of an early var. of a sound bite by a while who surely would have excelled at them. But one of the many another(prenominal) problems with this argument is that it assumes something of a Southern conspiracy in seceding, and this is not an accurate description of events. The South did not secede in a uniform

Barney, William. The Road to Secession: A naked as a jaybird Perspective on the Old South. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1972.

Before examining in greater detail the specific arguments do by different factions of secessionists, it is useful to examine the major acknowledgment for secession put forward by most of them. This is a doctrine (which has been informally expanded to include a routine of barely related concepts) referred to as states' rights.

The right of secession was in general regarded by seceding states as one of their sovereign powers, as the United States Constitution contained no prohibition in this reckon nor did it confer any power on the federal governing to compel a state to remain in the trades union against its wishes. Lincoln's administration always contested the right of the states to succeed, although one could considerably argue that the federal (Union) government was making this argument on political rather than purely legal grounds.

There were worries by many Southerners that some other section of the South would obtain supremacy in the area, as Rable notes:

Ironically - and a level off that speaks to the deep divisions that existed amongst the Southern states, the rhetoric of high taxation and lacking(p) representation and overly zealous federal governments was not barely raised by the Southern States against the U.S. government, but also by the border states in the South and those people whose caution and business organisation of revolution gave them the title of cooperationists - those Southerners who wished to avoid war and rupture and believed that some endless series of compromises could be strung together to moderate if not peaceful co-existence at least the avoidance of true war.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!