Literature: Storytelling

Put your name herePut professor s name hereClass NumberDate in the following format 8 May 2000Debate : How Did the Universe BeginIn his article divinity May Be the Creator Robert Jastrow writes how interesting it is that many stargazers flat call up that the universe does have a definite , detail beginning . He finds this interesting because scientists have fin on the whole(a)y arrived at the same stopping point theologians have held for centuriesJastrow is not disparaging scientists , he himself is one , but merely making an observation . He doesn t seem to have anything in dismantleicular at plunk for with his es theorize . He isn t going to stop being an astronomer , he s not going to stop using scientific methods . He is only reporting a fact Something that is part of the scientific methodThe tone of his essay is simple , straightforward and a bit surprised and somewhat amused . He finds himself in a situation that is odd given the history among cosmologists and theologiansIsaac Asimov , however , comes out swinging and pulling no punches in his response God is Not the Creator He is strong-growing , antagonistic and some seasons rude . He often doesn t kinda play fair , equivocating on the use of various address , insulting Jastrow and all non-scientists . He twists Jastrow s simple observation and engages in a polemic against non-scientific belief and against non-scientists in generalAsimov says that astronomers used to be sure that the Bible was wrong and that after centuries of work out they grew all downcast about their own discoveries (148 , because they had discovered that the Bible is beneficial I don t see this in Jastrow s writing . He doesn t appear downcast or despondent at allAsimov goes on to write that Jastrow is implying that since the Bible has all the answers .

it has been a waste of epoch , money and effort for astronomers to have been peering through there miniscule field glasses (emphasis mine ) all the time (148This isn t true . Jastrow made no such claims He did not write that the Bible had all the answers . Rather that two groups of people had come to the same conclusion by using different methods . He did not say that all astronomy work had been a waste of time , money and effortAt this point , Asimov becomes quite unfair and belittles Jastrow with his little spyglass (148 ) remark . The terms little and spyglass denigrate the work of astronomers and the astronomers themselves . He next suggests that Jastrow never had any faith in the power of reason This is unfair and sophomoric . An ad hominem attack says zero point about the argument , but a good hatch about the person making the attackAsimov equivocates on the term theologian first claiming it means that a theologian believes the universe had a beginning , then that the Bible has all the answers and now that theologians believe the Bible is literally true and that God created the universe in six days approximately 4004 years agoThis is clearly faithlessly . Asimov...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper