If you know you have Alzheimer's, how do you regard the person who will inherit your body? Is that person you? How is this case connected with philosophical theories of personal identity?

I discover that I have Alzheimers and that within the space of a year I will lose on the totally my memories and all my causa traits. I regard the soulfulness who will inherit my body during this time as one and the same person, numerically identical to the person who has been present in my body for my whole life previous to Alzheimers, but with a high take aim of qualitative identity. I believe that it is not my memories that make me myself nor is it my character traits, but rather, it is the fact that there is bodily doggedness amongst me without Alzheimers and me without any of my memories. The case of whether one holds this view or holds a different view is very closely connected with the diverse philosophical theories of personal identity. These theories are namely the psychological continuity view held by Parfit, the bodily continuity view, and the view that a endure person is marked out by their memories, held by Locke.

Locke believed that for a person, Y, at T2 to be one and the same person as X at T1 he must telephone doing what X did at T1. He holds the view that a persisting person is marked out by their memories.



This view though can be easily argued against, for example according to Lockes hypothesis a human being suffering from total amnesia ceases to exist as that person and a new person is created. I believe that this is a definite weakness in Lockes theory. I would suggest that if one remembers ones actions and then forgets them, it does not predict the end of a persons existence and the birth or creation of a new person. It indicates, rather, the need for Lockes theory to be revised and updated for it...

If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper