The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge is one of the most pristine environmental areas in our country, but it also is an area that contains the largest oil stand-in in the entire US. This has led to a very fierce and complicated debate as to whether we should keep this area or allow oil extraction. Environmentalists, conservationists, preservationists, as well as umteen others who care for the environment are against the oil industries agitateting their detention on this wildlife refuge. On the other hand, the oil industry on with some of the government and many businesses in our country zip for oil exploration. Each opposing side has their reasons for their stance on the issue, but it is clear that at the current time we collect to pursue oil exploration and extraction in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge.
        Those who are against the oil industry moving into the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge bring forth many arguments that comprehend with the harm that will be inflicted upon the environment and the native people. They hope that this area is very unique and very important to preserve so that future generations can appreciate the beauty and flavour of life that is present. They argue that the environment will be adversely affected; such that plants, animals and the air and water quality would generate negative effects.
As the US Fish and Wildlife Service reported, accumulative biological consequences could include: blocking, deflecting or disturbing wildlife, loss of subsistence lookup opportunities, and increased predation by arctic fox, gulls and ravens on nesting birds ascribable to introduction of garbage as a consistent nutriment source. Those who oppose the oil extraction also say that the add up of expected oil to be taken from the area is a great deal less than what the oil industry has calculated. Therefore they argue...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment