Prisoner Reentry in Michigan

The disk operating system of Michigan spends much specie on jails and prisons than it does on education, but is this m 1y well spent? The Michigan pris peerlessr ReEntry Initiative would suggest that it is. The MPRI is a collaborative effort that draws from the commitment of biotic community groups, the Michigan Department of Corrections, and different republic agencies. Launched in 2003 and expanded statewide in 2008, the initiatives mission is to equip every released offender with tools to pull round in the community.The MPRI is a nationally recognized commitment to popular safety that gives prisoners the tools they need to succeed in a process that begins when they enter prison and continues through battle cry and reintegration into the community. The MPRI has put togetherively reduced Michigans prison population, recidivism rate, and plague rate. (Figure 1) It has crushed the cycle of soaring Corrections costs by investing in safe alternatives to costly and unnecess arily long stays in prisons.By intermission the cycle of crime and incarceration, the MPRI has managed to cut using up on prisons down by 293 million dollars annually, and although that may be the biggest benefit it is one of many. (1) The number one goal of the MPRI is to reduce crime. It does that by better preparing pa character referencees before they return to the community, making smarter decisions about who is released and when, and providing enhanced supervision and services in the community. It ensures what capital of Michigan Prison Warden Kenneth McKee calls a game plan for success, which includes a team of supporters from the community who lead financial aid them carry out the plan. 1) MPRI begins at intake, when a prisoners risk, needs and strengths be measured to develop individualized programming. Prior to free, offenders be transferred to a reentry facility, and a regeneration plan, which addresses employment, housing, transportation, mentoring, counseling an d any necessary manipulation for psychogenic illness or addictions, is finalized in close collaboration with community service providers. After release, officers use firm but flexible have sanctions- including short stays in a reentry center if needed-to manage detect breaking before it escalates to more serious transgressions.All correctional jargon aside, the grassroots message remains you cant put offenders back into the smudge and lifestyle they came from before prison and expect the outcome to be different. This is where reentry comes into play. (2) The MPRI was strengthened in three phases to create seamless mutations back into society. Phase one is the getting ready phase. This phase begins the day the prisoner enters the prison. It starts at the reaction center with a comprehensive assessment of each prisoners risk factors, needs and strengths.A Transition Accountability Plan is formed to discover the services the prisoner go out need to prep are them for life aft er(prenominal) prison. This plan similarly establishes a tog of expectations for the prisoner and how well they bewilder to the plan weighs heavily in decisions made by the Parole and exchange come on. Phase twain is the going home phase. This phase begins about two months before the prisoners expected release date. During this phase, prisoners identified as needing more intensifier preparation and support are transferred to an in-reach center, a prison closer to home.This helps set the stage for a smooth and successful transition. The focus during this phase is also to help the prisoner find work and become employable as well as setting up unchanging housing. Depending on their needs, prisoners are linked with community services such as substance disgust treatment, mental health services, or evoke offender therapy. The conventional role of a parole officer is transformed to a case film director in an effort to help the transition team get a support system in place.When t he parole date arrives the prisoner is fortify with a structure and support network in place to help them succeed. Lastly, phase three is called the staying home phase. As opposed to a ex ago where parolees were released on a Friday and had a weekend or more to get into trouble before their first meeting with their parole agent, they are now released earlier in the week and they promptly meet with their parole agent and service providers. This first meeting is used to establish contrast leads, assist with resumes, ensure medical assistance if needed and identify stable housing. 1) This transformation of Michigans corrections system has been remarkable, but it did non happen overnight. Over the course of eight social classs the MPRI has moved from an liking of fixing a broken system to a comprehensive outline that is changing the nature of prisons. In doing this the MDOC has created many employment opportunities for positions such as parole agents, corrections officers, teach ers and case managers. The transformation has also changed the way former prisoners view people in these positions.Grand Raids police officer Terry Dixon runs a weekly support group for MPRI participants and says that Many are looking at police officers in a refreshed way, as supporters. (1) The MPRI is constantly meeting challenges one of the largest being special needs prisoners. Those include youths, the medically fragile, those with mental health issues and sex offenders. Before the MPRI, says Michigan Parole and Commutation Board Chairwoman Barbara Sampson, parole board members were reluctant to grant parole to the mentally ill because they knew services were not in place to help them succeed.Now, she said, the transition accountability plans are designed to ensure a smooth transition to the community. Similarly, she said, effective new treatment programs are in place for sex offenders. (1) The $56 million spent on the MPRI in fiscal year 2011 is substantial, but it is only a small fraction of the $2 trillion Michigan Department of Corrections budget, and it is paying back dividends in public safety and reducing the prison population.The rate of parolees returning to prison for new crimes or technical violations is at its lowest level since record property began 23 years ago. Even though there are more parolees, the number returning to prison for new crimes fell from 2. 020 in 2006 to a projected 1,836 in 2010. Michigans prison population grew by n earlier 500% between 1973 and 2003, consuming a much greater share of tax payer dollars. The number of prisoners has safely declined by nearly 7,500 since March of 2007 and is at its lowest level since 1999.As a result the state has been able to close 14 correctional facilities. (1) It is important to recognize what the MPRI is and what it is not. It is not a magic potion that will eliminate crime. It is also not an early release program. Every parolee has served at least the minimum motor lodge imposed sentence. MPRI is a strategy that pulls together the state, the community, police, mentors, therapists, and others to give each returning prisoner a game plan for success.Former Saint Clair County Community College professor Michael Berro explains the MPRI bottom line as being the understanding that the majority of felony offenders will return to our community. We should prepare them for it so they dont end up back here, spending our tax dollars again. (3) Michigan may be spending more money on jails and prisons than it does on education, but consider the effect the MPRI has had on repeat criminal offenses, inmates in prison and the general crime rate. It has successfully managed to lower all three.When the states budget is squeezed by declining tax revenue, and areas of spending are under question, it seems the success of a governing body funded program couldnt come at a better time. deeds SITED 1. Michigan Department of Corrections. (2010). Michigan prisoner ReEntry Initiative 2010 Progress Report. Lansing Public Policy Associates, Inc. 2. Wesoloski, E. (2011, April 15). Pew Center Report Lauds Michigan Prisoner Reentry Initiative. Prisons and Prisoners, p. 1. 3. Berro, M. (2006, March 13). Former Maccomb County Parole Supervisor, College Professor. (R. Spangler, Interviewer)