Do you think that Mr. Champlin should have consulted with the Navy Essay

Do you think that Mr. Champlin should have consulted with the navy before spending his time and money on this project - Essay ExampleNavy disregardless of whether they were lost or considered abandoned in U.S., foreign or international waters. These guidelines are based on the US Constitutional and international maritime laws and the ownership is consistent with Articles 95 and 96 of the Laws of the Sea Convention. These articles reap the terms of immunity of warships in international waters. Addition in ally, the statutes as they stand with regards to federal official property dictate that all lost or presumed abandoned ships and aircrafts should not be disturbed or removed without a musket ball application and approval of said application before the property is moved. Operating under this tenet, the actions of Mr. Champlin proved to be in violation of the law. Essentially, he was ignorant of the law but this does not relive any accountability for its compliance. I find it presu mptuous of Mr. Champlin to ask for a refund when he blatantly violated several(prenominal) statutes with regards to presumably abandoned governmental property.I feel that Mr. Champlin should make it his business to be appraised with regards to the special rules of federal property especially in light of the fact that he intended to gain possession of it.