        Brutus and Antony are both portrayed as above middling orators in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they both use this attainment to achieve there preplanned goals in there speeches. Brutuss goal was to curve the assassination of Caesar and to convince the people that Brutus and his fellow conspirators were actually heroes for what they did. On the other hand Antonys goal was to turn the people of capital of Italy against the conspirators and to more brightly illuminate the good things that Caesar did, and in doing so make the people want to seek revenge for there leaders death. Even though Brutus and Antony have separate and exclusively opposite goals they both use certain tactics to cost the crowd in there favor. They did this by appealing to the crowd, utilise irony, and by applying the principles of human behavior to the situation.
        First Brutus appealed to the crowed by devising himself seem no better than the people, and rationalized the assassination by video display that he and his fellow conspirators killed Caesar not for there own gain, provided for the greater good of the general public. We see this in the acknowledgment not that I sock Caesar less, but I love Rome more.
This utilitarian point of view went over quite well with the people, so well in incident that they tried to give Brutus the crown, but he refused it which later off out to perhaps not be the best choice. On the flip side of the arguments Antonym appealed to the people of Rome by telling them what they knew all along, that Caesar was a great ruler that he cared about all of them. But he did not tho tell the people this, he went a step tho and showed the people the will that...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment