racial discrimination in Joseph Conrads meat of Darkness         The question of racism in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness is one that has been argued by many critics and famed authors alike. The theory of racism being a dominant factor in in this book is one that Chinnua Achebe defends in his essay, An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrads Heart of DarknessÂ(251). However, C.P. Sarvan denies that racism is a major single out of Heart of Darkness, but that the book portrays an illusion of England during the 1900s(280). Harold R. collins also denounces Chinnua Achebes essay and believes that Heart of Darkness actually demoralizes the European man in Africa by exploiting the laziness of the Europeans versus the Africans (TCLC 104). Even Edward Garnett has a totally different view about racism in this book, in the essay entitled Psychological Power of Heart of Darkness (Blooms 25).
        First, Chinnua Achebe would like the subscribers of his essay to agree with what he declares as bloody racist (251). By using phrases instead of distinguish sentences from Heart of Darkness. For example, when Achebe quotes Marlows description of Kurtzs mistress, he only quotes the savage and superb, romantic and magnificent and that she is a savage counterpart to the refined, European cleaning woman who will step forth to end the story (Conrad 60).
He does not bother with the details of Kurtzs intended; to elaborate on the description that Marlow as it gives would discredit his theory. Another example is when Achebe quotes part of Marlows comment about the cannibals; fine fellows?cannibals?in their placeÂ(254). at once again he fails to provide the whole meaning that Marlow is act to depict about the difference between the cannibals and Europeans. Achebes continues to hook the reader of his essay by using the following two quotes: jot ?im, he snapped with...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment