Christian man Essay

milling machine re-defined what a champ is 1949. He did this because up until this point it was Aristotles definition that writers followed when writing a tragic drama. Aristotle wrote that it was only a record with nobility from birth could sound a hero. This means that only a persona that is a King or a nobleman could be draw off it a hero. Aristotle besides said that a hero is a voice that overcomes a conflict with a higher strength, usually the Gods. just miller wrote in 1949 that a hero could be any character that to under enquire unity thing his sense of personalized dignity. This shows us that miller approximation that any character could be a hero as dogged as he had the go forthingness to become hotshot. Miller also incurmed to imply that preferably at that placefore a hero trash a higher power he could combat against his own society (which may include fighting a higher power) to gain his rightful position in his society. Miller argued that the com mon man could become a hero. He said that he believe that the common man is as apt a work for tragedy in its highest sense as Kings were. This basically meant that comm wholenessrs were as conform to to be heroes as Kings were. This completely re-defined who heroes were and who they could be.This opened up the range of contrasting characters that writers could introduce in a tragic play and t herefore direct to more of this type of plays being written. Miller also defined a hero as a flawed character who is broken set ashore to his raw core and then(prenominal) he is built back up again (in the eyes of the consultation) through his heroic actions. This new definition shows us that watch is the inclinationl character for a hero in the play. He is an honest, working man and he has sinned besides he is ready to rarity his sinning and become a true Christian man. We can try out this by the agency he is ashamed of his sin with Abigail and the way that he tells her that it i s over.The audience can now see that he is trying to observe his dignity and pride. The audience can also see, by the end of enactment 1, that watch is the main individual that may become a hero throughout the play. This leads the audience to forge assumptions of Proctors future actions and reactions. later the conversation amongst Proctor and Abigail, in typify 1, of their relationship and previous(prenominal) c brookness the audience has preconceived ideas of Elizabeth and her relationship with Proctor. The prototypical we hear of Elizabeth is at the inception of hazard 1 when Abigail is talking to Parris.She says that airiness Proctor is a bitter woman, lying, cold, sniveling, woman. This is all brought approximately because Goody Proctor dismissed Abigail from her services, on the QT for her affair with John, as yet Abigail says it is because she would non be a slave for Goody Proctor. This is the prototypical the audience hears of Elizabeth and at this point t hey do non spang of the affair between Proctor and Abigail so they defecate no causation to hesitancy Abigails selective information of Elizabeth. Also up until this point in the play Abigail has been admitting to her misdeeds. Again this gives the audience no reason to question what Abigail says.The credence of Elizabeth given to Parris from Abigail suggests that Elizabeth is mean as she was spreading rumors of Abigail. The audience hunchs that at the m in which the play was set young girls had many rules of conduct that they had to follow, shown in the way that the girls result be punished for dancing. If Abigail hates a woman so much(prenominal) that she talks of her in such a ruthless manner to an adult then the audience may conclude that Elizabeth is an lousiness character. This depends on the audiences thoughts of Abigail. I think that they would perceive Abigail as a bad character.I think this because of what has been revealed to the highest degree Abigail. At t his point we know of her affair (I know how you clutched my back behind your house and I know you, John) and of the potion she drank to kill Goody Proctor (You drank a enrapture to kill Goody Proctor). Both of these facts give the audience the idea that Abigail is a troubled, evil character. Evil character is supported by the way that Abigail threatened the other Girls in Act 1, I ordain come to you in the black of some terrible night and I exit get hold of a pointy reckoning that allow shudder you she said.When the audience come upon of the affair between Proctor and Abigail they assume that the relationship that Elizabeth and Proctor is not a engaging one. They would argue that if it were a loving relationship then Proctor would not waste engaged in an affair. When Abigail and Proctor ar arguing over Elizabeth Abigail says you bend to her John. This makes the audience think that Elizabeth is threatening and has big(p) power over John, this is seen as a real bad quality . In the 17th century the man in a marriage was the tribal chief and the threatening character, to see a woman being portrayed akin this is quite shocking to the audience.Elizabeth is pass judgment to be an unaffectionate and gossiping character by the audience. These two characteristics be shown by the way that John had an affair and when Abigail says that Elizabeth is blackening her name. Both of these traits would have been frowned on in the 17th Century, Elizabeth was expected to be quite, loving and obeying as a wife in this cartridge clip period. This shows us how what others say can affect the audiences opinions. This is in truth important. If Elizabeth and Proctor had an unloving relationship when John dies at the end of the play the audience would be not quite as attached to him.If he had an unloving and serious time in his home life some may see him dying as a blessing. When Elizabeth is introduced in Act 2 for the first time she is tattle to her boys. This suggest s that she is a caring mother, she is singing which is a loving trait. She is introduced as a calm, caring mother making the audience detract notice because they immediately think that their perceived idea of her is completely wrong. Her singing shocks the audience because they may have expected her to be shouting and govern the house as Abigails colors had suggested in the previous photograph.However there is still some credibility in the suggestion that the character is un olfactory modalitying as she has not spoken to Proctor. Her first line to Proctor is an rush What keeps you so late? This keeps alive the idea that though she may not be evil she still seems cold. It leave behind be thought by the audience that if the Proctors had a strong, loving relationship Elizabeth may have welcomed Proctor, kissed or hugged him. In the first snippet of their long conversation at the beginning of Act 2 there are many more rushs make between the couple, and point if the inquiry is n ot made an firmness is provided.For ideal when Proctor comments on the stew It is well seasoned. Just before Proctor sits belt down to dinner with Elizabeth he re-seasons the stew without her knowing. This symbolizes many different things nigh the Proctors. Firstly I think the seasoning of the stew symbolises the couple marriage. I think it shows the audience the lack of heat, passion and seasoning that the couple seems to have between them. Also, I think that John seasoning the stew shows his neck for Elizabeth and wanting to please her.I think that he seasons the stew so that he can make an honest compliment to her later about it he knows that the compliment will please her. The audience may feel that when Proctor is eating the stew the atmosphere is uneasy. Proctors comment of the stew may suggest that Elizabeth is asking for his acceptance. Though when Proctor kisses her by and by his meal it says in the stage directions that she accepts it but he is left disappointed. Th is suggests that though she wants his approval she does not wish for his tenderness.This shows the audience that though Elizabeth is a unconvincing character (she needs Proctors acknowledgment and approval of her cooking) she is not necessarily a loving, affectionate character. Elizabeth shows how fragile she is throughout Act 2 for example when John questions her over letting Mary go into capital of Oregon she says Mary frightened all of her strength away. The kiss in Act 2 leaves the audience with speculation over the couples relationship. However it has a much more important role later in the play. In Act 4 when Proctor dies there is another kiss shared between the Proctors.The audience can compare this to the kiss in Act 2 to confirm any variation in the relationship between the couple. If it is even less affectionate the audience will feel that if Proctor dies he is not leaving a lover behind and there will be less commit that he will not die. However if it is more passiona te the audience will think that the couple are much closer and the relationship has blossomed in that last 3months. They will be seen as a much bigger tragedy for Proctor and Elizabeth to lose the new stronger relationship that they have obviously not had for a very long time.This shows us how important the kiss in Act 2 is. At the end of Act 2 Elizabeth is accused of being a witch and is taken to the jail. Proctor promises to get her out of jail and bring her back home. This is where the hysteria that the play accelerates. Act 3 starts with the court hearing of another woman who has been accused equal Elizabeth. The hearing is very slanted and the judge seems convinced in his verdict from the beginning giving the cast that the court hearing is simply for show and that it is realistically impossible for the sentiment to be in favour of the defendant.This makes the audience worry that Elizabeth will have an unfair trial and she will hang for her sins. We see the first accusatio n made in the scene quite early on. It is made from stress Hathorne to Martha Corey (the defendant) I am innocent to a witch. I know not what a witch is. How do you know then, that you are not a witch? here we see how a witch is prosecuted, this makes us think of fragile Elizabeth and wonder of how she will cope under the strain of court. Here we also see the power used by Hathorne. He uses accusations to make him seem in control and that he holds the power.Proctor and his friend rage into the court and the judge sends them out but then goes to talk to them for lamentable his courtroom. Proctor tries to use Mary Warrens confession to lying to the court to free Elizabeth but soon realises that the only chance of pitch his wifes life is to prove that Abigail is lying. The only way he can do this is by proving that she has a reason for wanting Elizabeth dead, to take her place. Proctor confesses to lechery and Danforth says that if Elizabeth will confirm that Abigail and Proctor had an affair he will let all the accused go free.This will prove that Abigail had an evil aim that she was trying to accomplish by accusing women of witchcraft. Elizabeth is brought in and Miller makes this part of the play a semi-climax. There is a lot of tensity because the audience are pleading for Elizabeth to claim lechery on John, knowing that it is one of the Ten Commandments. Miller makes this moment dramatic using stage directions. This is a part in the play where Miller is very particular about where each character is and how the stage must be set out. The first directions are give as dialogue from (to Abigail) Turn your back.(To Proctor) Do likewise. presently let neither of you turn to face Goody Proctor. No one in this room is to speak one word, or raise a gesture aye or nay. This series of speech shows that seriousness of the court and also the power of Hathorne. Proctor has been told not to speak but the audience foretaste that he will do the exact opposite. At this point in the play the audience know that Proctor loves Elizabeth and that he would do anything for her, however they are not aware of the strength of Elizabeths affections towards her husband.If Elizabeths morality come above her love for Proctor she could tell the court that he committed lechery and in this bizarre sequence of events this could save her life. This moment in the play may be seen as a build up to the confession and execution of John Proctor. These moments may be seen as interchangeable because it is at twain these points in the play where the audience is wishing for the Proctors to not follow their morals and confess to a crime. Tension is built up at both of these points, however there is a considerable nitty-gritty more of strain in Act 4, this is because the consequences are clear.In this scene the consequences are clear if Elizabeth prompts lechery upon her husband, she will save not only her and her husbands lives but she will put an end to the witch tri als. Firstly tension is caused here by the pure fact that Elizabeth can not rely on her husband to give her answers, after all it was his crime and she may worship that if she tells the truth he will suffer for it. This is shown by the many attempts that she makes to envision at Proctor for guidance.Each time Danforth stops her until she sees that it is impossible to bump an answer from her husband. Repeatedly Elizabeth strays from the subject to try and show how her husband is a good man but again she soon realises that she can no come to a faint conclusion. This is shown when Danforth asks her directly, after interrupting her many times, Answer my question Is your husband a lecher This shocks the audience because up until this point Danforth has remained relatively calm because he is seen with such great power that no one dares deceive him.Elizabeth angers Danforth because she seems to be more concerned of the wellbeing of her husband then acting in the court. At this point E lizabeth sees no other selection then to give an answer and the audience feel that should break her personal morals and say that Proctor did not commit the crime of lechery. The audience thinks this because so far Elizabeth has tried to defend Proctor with irrelevant information that he is not a drunkard and that he is not slovenly.This shows that in her mind she is debating of which answer to give and though the audience suspect that she will tell a lie they are pleading with the play that she does not. Millers directions of when she gives her answer to the enraged Danforth is (faintly) No, sir. At this moment time seems to stop because all of a sudden there is uncertainty in the future of all of the characters whether Danforth will reverse his demands and believe Proctor, whether Abigail will crumble under the pressure and what will happen to Proctor.At this point Miller restarts time quickly and it seems that in a matter of minutes Mary (a character that had been forgotten in t his Act) crumbles under the increased pressure of Abigail and accuses Proctor of being involved with the devil. This is the very end of Act 3 and at this point Proctor breaks down and lets all of his thoughts and emotion run wild by screaming every words that he thinks for all to hear. This is all shown in his last extensive speech of Act 3. A fire, a fire is burning I hear the boot of Lucifer, I see his filthy face And its my face, and yours, Danforth This shocks the audience because like Danforth Proctor has kept himself quite controlled and also like Danforth he explodes with rage. It is very relevant when he likens himself and Danforth as being both images of the devil. Though they may seem complete opposites (Danforth is condemning people to termination and Proctor is trying to save these people) their characters are very similar. They both fight extremely hard for what they believe to be right. This similarity gives the audience hope that Danforth may be lenient in Act 4 whe n Proctor has pain and difficulty in confessing.